From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: dump-emacs doesn't fail even if Pure Lisp storage overflows
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:44:05 -0500
Message-ID: <E1F0jG1-00064V-E7@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Ezqu4-0001hM-00@etlken> <87slrhedhb.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137961149 1990 80.91.229.2 (22 Jan 2006 20:19:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 22 21:19:07 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0lfw-0007gT-TC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:19:01 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0liN-0005wT-1w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:21:31 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0jLz-0002FJ-FI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:50:15 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F0jLy-0002Ej-AT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:50:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0jLx-0002EU-UD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:50:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F0jQZ-00026u-29
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:54:59 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1F0jG1-00064V-E7; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:44:05 -0500
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87slrhedhb.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 22
	Jan 2006 02:48:07 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49405
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49405>

    This message is very easy to miss.  Perhaps it should be changed to allow
    highlighting by one of the compile.el rules, for instance:

    emacs:0:warning: Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1181968 bytes needed)

That is a good idea--but this should be an error, not a warning.
I will do it.