From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: rcirc manual
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:12 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Exo2e-0007tT-4U@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87ek3hgunn.fsf@killalla.dreaming> <uek3cs78r.fsf@gnu.org>
	<9abbd5730601130610w4507670aqd122cb33bc564486@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137259752 31272 80.91.229.2 (14 Jan 2006 17:29:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:29:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bkhl@member.fsf.org, eliz@gnu.org, rcyeske@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 18:29:09 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExpDA-0005s1-Fy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:29:08 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ExpFK-0005L7-Ug
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:23 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Exo7R-0006wO-Pg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:19:10 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Exo7O-0006uV-69
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:19:06 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Exo7N-0006uD-53
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:19:05 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ExoAX-00057F-C1; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:22:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Exo2e-0007tT-4U; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:14:12 -0500
Original-To: Alex Schroeder <kensanata@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <9abbd5730601130610w4507670aqd122cb33bc564486@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Alex Schroeder on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:10:13 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49078
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49078>

    As for the em dash suggestion: Is there a convention or tradition for
    the GNU manuals to prefer em dashes?

We use em dashes following generally TeX recommendations.
I'd rather not consider the question of changing this practice.