From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows-XXXX and cpXXXX Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:35:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137198846 28668 80.91.229.2 (14 Jan 2006 00:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 01:34:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no ([193.71.71.242]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExZ6a-0001wr-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:17:17 +0100 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.13.1/8.13.1/GN) with ESMTP id k0BFJO82041590 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:19:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ewhdz-0005KE-9c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ewfd4-0004AG-7b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ewfd1-00049X-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EweJC-00064e-SE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EweLn-0001nC-Hu; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0BBaJjb027026; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:36:19 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0BBZagj025985; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:36:18 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EweGM-0006Ms-00; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:35:34 +0900 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:18:57 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49048 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Emacs currently knows these windows-* coding sysmtems: >> >> windows-1250 windows-1251 windows-1252 windows-1253 >> windows-1254 windows-1255 windows-1256 windows-1257 windows-1258 >> >> and these cp* coding systems: >> >> cp437 cp720 cp737 cp775 cp850 cp851 cp852 cp855 cp857 cp860 >> cp861 cp862 cp863 cp864 cp865 cp866 cp869 cp874 cp1125 Here, I forgot to add cp1251 and cp9XXs. >> But it seems that windows-XXXX are quite frequently called >> as cpXXXX(*). If so, I'll register cpXXXXs as alises of the >> corresponding windows-XXXXs, ok? > Won't that increase the confusion, which is IMHO already too high, > between codepage.el and code-pages.el? They already support a coding system of the same name (e.g. cp720) in a different way. What kind of confusion does making aliases cp125[02345678] increase? > The cpXXX encodings you listed above are for DOS only, so > it is okay to call them cp*. I didn't intend to change them. My suggestion is just to make cp125[02345678] as an aliases of windows-125[02345678]. Actualy cp1251 is already an alias of windows-1251. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org