From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: GtkPlug patch
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:15:12 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Eu1vU-0001Qt-NA@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200601030753.k037rc1o021950@coolsville.localdomain>
	<E1Etqsj-0008VT-MY@fencepost.gnu.org> <85d5j9f99e.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<1136320184.7852.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136355420 28086 80.91.229.2 (4 Jan 2006 06:17:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 06:17:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 04 07:16:57 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eu1x4-0005uh-Re
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:16:51 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eu1yj-0007j7-F6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:18:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eu1yZ-0007j0-H7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:18:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Eu1yZ-0007io-3A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:18:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eu1yY-0007il-Vv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:18:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eu1zu-0003AQ-Ro
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:19:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Eu1vU-0001Qt-NA; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 01:15:12 -0500
Original-To: Timo Savola <timo.savola@iki.fi>
In-reply-to: <1136320184.7852.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from
	Timo Savola on Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:29:44 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48681
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48681>

    The current patches are quite trivial.  I guess a bigger question is:
    against which branch should the Xlib/Xt version be implemented?

Either the trunk, or the Unicode-2 branch, since we plan to merge that
in after the release.

But I think it would be better if you work from the trunk.