From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TNT not working reliably in Emacs
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:15:18 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Esskg-0003R6-8T@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512291558510.24788@oontz.dissonant.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136081855 8272 80.91.229.2 (1 Jan 2006 02:17:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 02:17:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 01 03:17:34 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Essmo-0008FF-Ge
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:17:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EssoJ-0003LO-LH
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:19:03 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EssnP-00030r-9e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:18:07 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EssnO-00030A-D0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:18:06 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EssnO-0002zx-3h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:18:06 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EssoB-0004B5-Dh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:18:55 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Esskg-0003R6-8T; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:15:18 -0500
Original-To: Scott Evans <gse@antisleep.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512291558510.24788@oontz.dissonant.org> (message
	from Scott Evans on Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:07:11 -0800 (PST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48597
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48597>

      I've not yet tried a proxy to see if the server is responding
    in the unsuccessful cases.

It would be very useful to find a way of determining exactly
what the server sends back.  Then we would know for certain
whether the data is lost inside Emacs.

If it is, we could add some debugging code to log everything inside
the relevant asynchronous Emacs code, and that way we could fix the
bug.