From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: add-hook versus custom-set-variables
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:36:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EsmWx-00031U-F0@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <24044.1135811115@olgas.newt.com>
	<87irt87fkp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87psne489j.fsf@olgas.newt.com>
	<87bqyyxlzs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1136057942 18360 80.91.229.2 (31 Dec 2005 19:39:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:39:02 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wohler@newt.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 31 20:39:00 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsmZ5-0000cc-Iu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:38:55 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsmaY-0004Os-RJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:40:26 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsmZV-0003rC-0f
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:39:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsmZU-0003qk-Ah
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:39:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EsmZU-0003qf-80
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:39:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EsmaE-0007PS-H6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:40:06 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EsmWx-00031U-F0; Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:36:43 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87bqyyxlzs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:25:59 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48591
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48591>

    Maybe we could introduce a new macro `do-after-load' or `after-load' or
    `eval-after'?

Since this is not a new feature, and the issue is not a bug, let's not
consider changing it now.