From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Customizing faces with `defcustom' Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:17:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: <43103F48.1020804@gmx.at> <4313F4CB.10200@gmx.at> <4375A332.6070000@gmx.at> <87fyperhgd.fsf@jurta.org> <438D5913.7030801@gmx.at> <43ABFA5C.2080302@gmx.at> <87y82afehi.fsf@jurta.org> <43B01C54.2040005@gmx.at> <87oe32fmt0.fsf@jurta.org> <43B26315.20005@gmx.at> <87acekpoho.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135909127 14629 80.91.229.2 (30 Dec 2005 02:18:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 03:18:46 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es9qs-0004eb-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:18:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es9sF-0007bk-BH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Es9ry-0007Z4-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Es9rx-0007Ys-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es9rx-0007Yp-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Es9sP-0004n3-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Es9ph-0005d4-AK; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:17:29 -0500 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87acekpoho.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:23:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48521 Archived-At: The main purpose of `Buffer-menu-buffer' is to highlight buffer names in the *Buffer List* buffer (since it is defined in buff-menu.el). But the same face is also used to highlight buffer names in the mode line. It seems like bad design to use the same face for both. There should be a special separate face for the mode line. What would be a good name for it? `mode-line-buffer'? This is too specific. `mode-line-buffer' would be a good name for a face used only to highlight buffer names. But if we want something a little more general, how about `mode-line-emphasis'? There are modes that could use this new face. For example, info.el highlights in bold only the Info buffer name which is not quite important. But the Info node name in the mode line (which is more important than the Info buffer name) is not highlighted. Let's use `mode-line-emphasis' for that too.