From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Customizing faces with `defcustom' Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:48:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <43103F48.1020804@gmx.at> <4313F4CB.10200@gmx.at> <4375A332.6070000@gmx.at> <87fyperhgd.fsf@jurta.org> <438D5913.7030801@gmx.at> <43ABFA5C.2080302@gmx.at> <87y82afehi.fsf@jurta.org> <43B01C54.2040005@gmx.at> <87oe32fmt0.fsf@jurta.org> <43B26315.20005@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135810298 5738 80.91.229.2 (28 Dec 2005 22:51:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 28 23:51:36 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Erk6V-0001Cq-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:49:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Erk7p-0008BF-Va for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Erk7b-0008B0-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Erk7b-0008An-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Erk7b-0008Ak-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Erk7q-0004fb-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Erk5V-0007Ik-Vm; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:48:06 -0500 Original-To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <43B26315.20005@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:04:05 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48462 Archived-At: > Buffer-menu-buffer > display-time-mail-face > mode-line-highlight > mode-line-inactive > mode-line > The question is whether the corresponding faces should be simultaneously removed from the `basic-faces' group. I am not sure what you mean by "corresponding faces" in this context. The face `mode-line' -- not something that "corresponds" to it, but the very same symbol -- is in the `basic-faces' group as well as the modeline group. Please don't change the `basic-faces' group.