From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Customizing faces with `defcustom' Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:01:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <43103F48.1020804@gmx.at> <4313F4CB.10200@gmx.at> <4375A332.6070000@gmx.at> <87fyperhgd.fsf@jurta.org> <438D5913.7030801@gmx.at> <43ABFA5C.2080302@gmx.at> <87y82afehi.fsf@jurta.org> <43B01C54.2040005@gmx.at> <87oe32fmt0.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135791392 809 80.91.229.2 (28 Dec 2005 17:36:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 28 18:36:31 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ErfDx-0004iP-6Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:36:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ErfFF-0001A8-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EreiH-0001UU-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:03:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EreiF-0001TB-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:03:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EreiF-0001Sd-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:03:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EreiR-0007KJ-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EregC-0000H5-BH; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:01:36 -0500 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87oe32fmt0.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:04:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48435 Archived-At: There is still the last face in the group `faces' that doesn't belong to this group: `display-time-mail-face'. Currently it is in two groups: `faces' and `display-time'. So we could remove it from `faces'. Yes, I think we should. However, there is another similar face that is used to highlight text in the mode line: `Buffer-menu-buffer'. We could create a new group `modeline-faces' and add all modeline-related faces to this new group. The faces that could be added to `modeline-faces' are: Buffer-menu-buffer display-time-mail-face mode-line-highlight mode-line-inactive mode-line This seems ok, but please call it mode-line-faces.