From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: menu-bar: disable items when no frame visible Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:56:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <708F3D2D-A87C-4F80-BC27-171D82653F4D@gmail.com> <069BF3EB-C5E4-4042-91E9-0DFB37C58E99@gmail.com> <87u0d3cu9y.fsf@jurta.org> <87y82b7evb.fsf@jurta.org> <9F80EEEC-3EDF-47B5-9837-2091650A8C5D@gmail.com> <87x6v29lvv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <878xu7alwx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135634273 14120 80.91.229.2 (26 Dec 2005 21:57:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, david.reitter@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 26 22:57:51 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Er0LU-0000CE-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:57:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Er0Mi-0006fZ-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Er0MS-0006dP-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:58:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Er0MR-0006cj-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Er0MR-0006ca-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Er0MK-0005KQ-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:58:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Er0Kg-00070H-67; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:56:42 -0500 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <878xu7alwx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:02:31 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48390 Archived-At: As Eli points out in another message, you misunderstood the problem described by Juri. The question that I'm talking about is why two specific commands have a property to let them invoke recursive minibuffers, and whether there is a reason it should be so. Reitter, I think, raised that question. Another question is whether find-file should do something different if it cannot display the buffer in the selected window.