From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: GTK file selector
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:20:56 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EpYnw-00060d-01@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200512220927.jBM9RHcE021048@coolsville.localdomain>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135290082 29771 80.91.229.2 (22 Dec 2005 22:21:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:21:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, ich@frank-schmitt.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 22 23:21:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpYoG-0003VT-Eb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:21:16 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpYpH-0004Rk-9V
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:22:19 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpYp7-0004RM-1X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:22:09 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EpYp5-0004R6-Mt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:22:07 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpYp5-0004R3-Jp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:22:07 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EpYoH-00043r-3X
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:21:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EpYnw-00060d-01; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:20:56 -0500
Original-To: "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
In-reply-to: <200512220927.jBM9RHcE021048@coolsville.localdomain>
	(jan.h.d@swipnet.se)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48225
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48225>

    Yes it can be done.  But is it really worthwhile for a dialog that is
    not default in the first place, and that will probably be gone from GTK soon?

If it is so easy, why not do it?

If the old file dialog works better, should we make it the default?
We could also pressure for it not to be deleted.