From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: toolbar conventions
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:33:13 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EokQL-0004ox-4V@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBAEBACOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135103778 13928 80.91.229.2 (20 Dec 2005 18:36:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 20 19:36:18 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EomGJ-0003N1-PT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:30:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EomHE-0002qK-0i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:31:56 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EokTB-0000DZ-D0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:36:09 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EokTA-0000Cv-Fp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:36:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EokT9-0000CY-Uo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:36:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EokWJ-0000IE-AY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:39:23 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EokQL-0004ox-4V; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:33:13 -0500
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBAEBACOAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:48102
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/48102>

    I think "option" and "face" are good terms for what they stand for
    currently.

The discussion of Custom has to mention them both together
so much that we need some word for the two together.

I'm not going to write "option and face" over and over.
I'm going to use a single term, even if it has to be "foobar".