From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [drew.adams@oracle.com: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation] Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:59:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134864590 10892 80.91.229.2 (18 Dec 2005 00:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 18 01:09:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Enm6i-0003FQ-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:08:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Enm7U-0008An-7v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:09:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Enm0W-0005yp-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:02:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Enm0T-0005wv-Q2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Enm0T-0005wU-1n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Enm38-0003Ts-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Enly3-0000rN-GL; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:59:59 -0500 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:29:11 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47969 Archived-At: So I understand from your response that it is okay for Fx_create_frame to be entered recursively, yes? There is a part of it which should not be entered recursively, while the frame is partially set up. Before or after that part is ok.