From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in meaning of "user options"
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:32:52 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EmJdc-0002Pg-71@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICOEBPDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134517002 27602 80.91.229.2 (13 Dec 2005 23:36:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 14 00:36:40 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from [199.232.75.2] (helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EmJf9-0002Ih-4e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:34:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EmJfh-00006u-Si
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:35:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EmJfS-000066-DT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:34:46 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EmJfQ-0008VK-Gi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:34:45 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmJfQ-0008V2-B7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:34:44 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EmJhO-0003MC-AL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:36:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EmJdc-0002Pg-71; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:32:52 -0500
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICOEBPDAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 199.232.75.2
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47645
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47645>

    We discussed this a while back, but I agree that it would be good to come to
    a conclusion. Are you proposing that we discuss and decide this _now_, and
    make the necessary changes before the 22.1 release?

Yes.  These are problems in changes that I've made since Emacs 21,
and we should fix them before it goes out.