From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:57:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <55DA5764-DDB6-4858-9CE2-065857CDC863@gnu.org> <3AFF0594-F842-4079-9A3B-D1CF7358A281@raeburn.org> <0D268F0D-B278-4307-86E3-E0FCE7A3B57B@raeburn.org> <87pso6anui.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87wtibiti7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134342164 12601 80.91.229.2 (11 Dec 2005 23:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 00:02:44 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElaCx-0001nj-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:02:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElaDP-0000Ji-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:02:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ela9O-0007A6-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ela9M-00079G-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ela9M-000799-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ElaAy-0000G5-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Ela7t-0007jj-SS; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:57:05 -0500 Original-To: Chong Yidong In-reply-to: <87wtibiti7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:43:44 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47488 Archived-At: As Kim has mentioned, it is unclear what bugs you are referring to. There are only a couple of bugs listed in FOR-RELEASE. The bugs in emacs-pretest-bug, which are usually minor problems, get fixed at about the same rate as they are being reported, i.e. after a few days. Maybe the reason you have the idea that bugs aren't being fixed because developers sometimes don't send a follow-up email to the list when they check their fix into CVS. I hope soon to have time to recheck the saved mail. But there are several messages I have posted more than once on this list, with no response, which will go into FOR-RELEASE when I get future reminders.