From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [evilborisnet@netscape.net: weird behavior of ediff with
	multiple displays]
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:04:58 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ekjnu-0003Hb-3o@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051207235332.3E7B520734B@kiferdesk.lmc.cs.sunysb.edu>
	<E1EkRQY-00012R-3g@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<lorentey.g.e.devel.87oe3rmipn.elte@walrus.fnord.hu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134154119 12050 80.91.229.2 (9 Dec 2005 18:48:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 19:48:24 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EknI0-0000g4-4e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:48:16 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EknIL-0002oQ-6J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:48:37 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkjpB-0004LD-GN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:06:18 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ekjp5-0004JF-2D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:06:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekjp0-0004IK-MH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:06:07 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkjqD-0002er-QQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:07:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ekjnu-0003Hb-3o; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:04:58 -0500
Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?iso-8859-2?Q?L=F5rentey_K=E1roly?=)
In-reply-to: <lorentey.g.e.devel.87oe3rmipn.elte@walrus.fnord.hu>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47321
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47321>

    When Emacs starts up under X, it automatically initializes
    default-minibuffer-frame to be the initial frame.

Sorry, I did not see that when I searched (because it's in Lisp).
I guess your change is ok.