From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: AGAIN: Can't isearch =?iso-8859-1?q?=27=F6=27?=
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:42:31 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EkXHL-0000pt-N4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1EkBTG-0004m2-00@etlken> <jwvk6efh7wu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134092756 31316 80.91.229.2 (9 Dec 2005 01:45:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:45:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 02:45:48 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkXJd-0006es-DV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:44:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkXJw-0006yx-TT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:45:12 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkXIP-0006YL-1S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:43:37 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EkXIO-0006Xv-ED
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:43:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkXIM-0006Xp-JG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:43:36 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkXJT-0000hN-N5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:44:43 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EkXHL-0000pt-N4; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:42:31 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <jwvk6efh7wu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:39:12 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47279
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47279>

    My original suggestion is still an alternative, of course:

I think that is too radical to be done without a careful study of what
is really right.  We should not make such a radical change now.
I've chosen to go with Handa's more cautious change.