From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bootstrap problem with union Lisp_Object Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <55DA5764-DDB6-4858-9CE2-065857CDC863@gnu.org> <3AFF0594-F842-4079-9A3B-D1CF7358A281@raeburn.org> <0D268F0D-B278-4307-86E3-E0FCE7A3B57B@raeburn.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134017898 984 80.91.229.2 (8 Dec 2005 04:58:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 08 05:58:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkDqk-0003ED-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 05:57:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkDr1-0007Yr-93 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EkDo7-0006Dx-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EkDo6-0006Da-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkDo5-0006DS-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:55:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EkDp3-0005sp-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:56:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EkDnD-00043t-9h; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:54:07 -0500 Original-To: Ken Raeburn In-reply-to: <0D268F0D-B278-4307-86E3-E0FCE7A3B57B@raeburn.org> (message from Ken Raeburn on Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:12:56 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47206 Archived-At: If people think this is a good idea, I could start changing those macros that use eassert (XSET, XCONS, XVECTOR, ...) to have GCC and non-GCC versions, with the GCC versions using statement expressions (inline functions wouldn't preserve the file and line number) and temporary variables, and error out if ENABLE_CHECKING is defined but GCC isn't used. Should be straightforward, about a dozen places or so to change I think. Is this really necessary now? I hope not.