From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [evilborisnet@netscape.net: weird behavior of ediff with multiple displays] Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:58:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20051207021005.A09C1CBED5@kiferserv.kiferhome.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133996509 12573 80.91.229.2 (7 Dec 2005 23:01:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, evilborisnet@netscape.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 08 00:01:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8HJ-0001mB-4h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8HY-0007m6-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8G5-0006jK-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:59:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8G4-0006hb-9M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:59:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8G3-0006hM-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:59:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ek8Gy-0003yI-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Ek8FD-0006UH-Ob; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:58:39 -0500 Original-To: Michael Kifer In-reply-to: <20051207021005.A09C1CBED5@kiferserv.kiferhome.com> (message from Michael Kifer on Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:10:05 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47171 Archived-At: (make-frame (list '(name . "FOOBAR") '(minibuffer . nil) That says this frame should not have its own minibuffer. Emacs handles that by creating a separate minibuffer frame for this frame to use. That is the right thing for it to do. Given that, can you determine whether there's a bug, and whether it is in ediff?