From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: fancy-splash-screen customize group...
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:41:53 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ejft3-00071W-K6@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICOEKNCPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1EjJMG-0005sX-6g@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87r78ra0t6.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133887774 27820 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 16:49:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:49:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 17:49:33 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjfwG-00053Q-Qx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:45:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjfwS-0002Sr-8a
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:45:24 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ejfti-0001SE-Nb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:42:35 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ejfth-0001Qs-BU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:42:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejfth-0001Qp-7b
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:42:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjfuO-0006a2-Nv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:43:16 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ejft3-00071W-K6; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:41:53 -0500
Original-To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
In-reply-to: <87r78ra0t6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on
	Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:52:37 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47055
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47055>

    > I think this would only be marginally useful, not enough to justify
    > the added complexity, so my decision is not to add it.

    As for additional complexity, I implemented the idea for my own
    personal amusement, and it was easy.

When I talk about added complexity, that is not a matter of how hard
this is to implement.  It makes the custom buffer interface more
complex.