From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Function for deleting a key binding in a sparse keymap
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:38:26 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EjJMA-0005oQ-15@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <439382B9.7020802@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133802120 26913 80.91.229.2 (5 Dec 2005 17:02:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 18:01:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjJgw-0008CW-La
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:59:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjJh4-0004yC-DF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:00:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjJMl-0000Oj-G6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:39:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EjJMi-0000LY-Oo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:39:01 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjJMg-0000LB-4n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:39:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjJNC-0008Dp-Ha
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:39:30 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EjJMA-0005oQ-15; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:38:26 -0500
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <439382B9.7020802@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:58:49 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47005
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/47005>

    It would be good to have a function like this in Emacs:

    (defun delete-key-in-sparse-map(sparse-map key)

This function makes sense; I see how it could be used.  Do we really
need it now?