From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: differ in signdness warnings.
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:30 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EiZmQ-00064g-QD@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <4390624C.6090600@swipnet.se> <ubqzzbavv.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133625906 22432 80.91.229.2 (3 Dec 2005 16:05:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 17:05:02 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZql-0004FE-E3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:02:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZqn-0000p0-K6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:03:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZmd-0007pN-Qb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:44 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EiZmc-0007mw-AM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:42 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiZmb-0007ll-FN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:41 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EiZmm-0005js-0W
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EiZmQ-00064g-QD; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:58:30 -0500
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <ubqzzbavv.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 02
	Dec 2005 20:40:36 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46937
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46937>

    How about if we complain loudly to the GCC maintainers about these
    silly warnings, and ask them to modify GCC so that it issues them only
    under -Wall?

I would support asking them to show a justification for this change.