From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Indentation problem in corporating major modes
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:20 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ei0KW-0007qs-55@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BAY112-F1393D7EB599F78485332E4DA4D0@phx.gbl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133489580 19629 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2005 02:13:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 02:13:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 03:12:52 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ei0Oy-0002ne-RC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:11:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ei0L2-0007sd-HY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:52 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ei0Kg-0007qi-DX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:30 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ei0KX-0007lv-TP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ei0KX-0007lH-3x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ei0KW-0003ED-L6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:20 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ei0KW-0007qs-55; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:07:20 -0500
Original-To: "Herbert Euler" <herberteuler@hotmail.com>
In-reply-to: <BAY112-F1393D7EB599F78485332E4DA4D0@phx.gbl>
	(herberteuler@hotmail.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46870
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46870>

    What does clean mean here? Is mmm-mode not clean enough?

I don't know.  What does mmm-mode do?  What are its limitations?
Would the developers sign copyright assignments for it?