From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r79fuf4z.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87u0e7i3us.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87fyppi8cl.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87mzjxdk66.fsf@jurta.org> <85iruk4qnf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87br0co9ym.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87zmnwmhlv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87irujq3ls.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <85psorzskw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87acfv60ne.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87ek54lbp8.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87r792fom6.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133153324 2157 80.91.229.2 (28 Nov 2005 04:48:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 04:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: belanger@truman.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 28 05:48:35 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Egava-0003hV-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EgavY-0000xt-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EgauV-0000Rl-1j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EgauT-0000Ql-Rj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EgauT-0000QJ-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EgauT-0003IC-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EgauQ-0006DJ-S7; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:46:34 -0500 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87r792fom6.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 22:04:33 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46683 Archived-At: If there is no hurry with the decision, then given the fact that there are better keybindings, what about the following plan? 1. Bind `C-h =' to `what-cursor-position' and `C-h c' to `describe-char', but keep `C-x =' bound to `what-cursor-position'. Please let's not devote attention at this point to ideas for changes in old key bindings. Let's stick to fixing bugs.