From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key-binding clash between gnus and calc Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:14:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <85acg5u9nl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lkzo1s34.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87r79fuf4z.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87u0e7i3us.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87fyppi8cl.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87mzjxdk66.fsf@jurta.org> <85iruk4qnf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87br0co9ym.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> <87zmnwmhlv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132723225 19784 80.91.229.2 (23 Nov 2005 05:20:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: belanger@truman.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 06:20:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Een0d-0003EW-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:17:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Een0b-0004OY-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EemyF-0001ew-Q5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EemyD-0001d2-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EemyC-0001cm-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EemyC-0004dN-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EemyB-00008g-G4; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:14:59 -0500 Original-To: belanger@truman.edu In-reply-to: <87zmnwmhlv.fsf@vh213602.truman.edu> (message from Jay Belanger on Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:40:28 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46464 Archived-At: For C-x , = `!', `%', `&', `*', `_', `~', `|', `\', `"', `:' or `,' might work, and some of them might be accessible without the shift key on most keyboards. But without the extra control key, I'm not sure they're "out of the way" enough to get the green light. One of those might be ok. Perhaps any of them is ok. I see no particular reason to oppose the use of any of them.