From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: FW: Emacs non-ascii characters
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:36 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EeNmq-0006vV-Gq@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEECACPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132626236 25730 80.91.229.2 (22 Nov 2005 02:23:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:23:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jorussel@cisco.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 03:23:55 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EeNo0-0007vD-9J
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 03:22:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EeNny-0004pz-On
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:22:46 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EeNmu-0003oB-2w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:40 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EeNms-0003lF-Bi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:38 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EeNmr-0003kt-Uy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:38 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EeNmr-0006uL-Em
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:38 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EeNmq-0006vV-Gq; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:21:36 -0500
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICEECACPAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46422
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46422>

    This makes me wonder if `C-\' isn't a bad binding for such a command. Should
    toggling the input method be on a key binding that is easy to hit by
    mistake?

Please don't suggest changes in features that were in Emacs 21.
It is a distraction from the bug-fixing we need to do.