From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: miles@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, snogglethorpe@gmail.com,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple debugging sessions
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:23:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Eb2px-00039b-5V@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17269.30220.666193.179305@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sat, 12 Nov 2005 17:56:44 +1300)
I've not said that it's not desirable, but that its not a trivial task and I
think there are more immediate and important goals. Moving over to GDB/MI
aligns us with GDB development and will make a much more reliable interface.
Can preparing to support multiple debug sessions be a secondary design goal
when you switch to GDB/MI?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-12 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-19 2:37 `overlay-arrow-position' should be automatically buffer-local Daniel Brockman
2005-10-19 2:48 ` Ryan Yeske
2005-10-19 4:22 ` Daniel Brockman
2005-10-19 20:16 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-19 6:13 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-19 6:34 ` Ryan Yeske
2005-10-19 7:33 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-19 20:15 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-19 8:44 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-19 20:44 ` Ryan Yeske
2005-10-19 21:02 ` Nick Roberts
2005-10-19 21:29 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-20 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2005-10-20 4:45 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-10 4:48 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-10 6:51 ` Multiple debugging sessions [was Re: `overlay-arrow-position' should be automatically buffer-local] Nick Roberts
2005-11-10 8:39 ` Multiple debugging sessions Kim F. Storm
2005-11-10 11:06 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-10 12:34 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-10 12:43 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-10 11:19 ` Multiple debugging sessions [was Re: `overlay-arrow-position' should be automatically buffer-local] Miles Bader
2005-11-10 18:08 ` Multiple debugging sessions Stefan Monnier
2005-11-11 1:00 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-11 4:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-10 19:12 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-10 22:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-11-12 3:38 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-12 4:56 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-12 5:53 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-12 6:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-12 21:23 ` Richard M. Stallman [this message]
2005-11-12 22:15 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-11 0:31 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-11 1:03 ` Miles Bader
2005-11-11 9:12 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-11 19:34 ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-11 3:50 ` Nick Roberts
2005-11-11 4:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-11 7:41 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-11 9:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-12 3:38 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-11 8:30 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-11 9:46 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Eb2px-00039b-5V@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=snogglethorpe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).