From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: display-buffer
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:45 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EXmpB-0005uP-GC@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17257.22797.999009.881227@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131054151 27342 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2005 21:42:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 22:42:23 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXmq8-0002K7-VC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:41:45 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXmq6-0007Cv-TV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:41:42 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXmpI-00073B-3k
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:52 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXmpG-00072L-B1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmpG-00072C-2a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:50 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EXmpF-0006Tj-JJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:49 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EXmpB-0005uP-GC; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:45 -0500
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17257.22797.999009.881227@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:25:49 +1300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45368
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/45368>

    If I force a new frame by setting pop-up-frames to t or using
    special-display-regexps then this window *is* selected.

Is it _always_ selected?
Do you use click-to-focus or focus-follows-mouse?

    Is that a bug?

If you use focus-follows-mouse, and the new frame
pops up where the mouse is, then I think this is
imevitable.  Otherwise, I think it is a bug.