From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fringe angle bitmap at at eob Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87u0f3uhci.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131054171 27411 80.91.229.2 (3 Nov 2005 21:42:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mmaug@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 22:42:49 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmpM-000298-Jr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:40:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmpL-0006xa-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmp4-0006x4-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmp0-0006wL-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXmp0-0006wE-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EXmp0-0006TC-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EXmow-0005sm-8c; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:40:30 -0500 Original-To: storm@cua.dk In-reply-to: (rms@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45369 Archived-At: Yesterday I wrote I don't see the rotation--or any change. What I see is the same behavior we had yesterday. but I ran it again, and that time, did see your change. The new code has the same problem that the previous change fixed: the "end of buffer" indicator seems to indicate the end is on the previous line. Even though the final newline changes the of the indicator, the indicator used when there's a newline appears to say the end is above the newline. That is no good. This is the problem I decided must be solved. Putting back the old code is one way, but other solutions might be ok if you want to look for one. In general, please don't make changes that undo my decisions without getting my approval.