From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Fringe angle bitmap at at eob
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:29 -0500
Message-ID: <E1EXFr3-0001N9-Uv@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87u0f3uhci.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<loom.20051101T205612-897@post.gmane.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130929778 8665 80.91.229.2 (2 Nov 2005 11:09:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:09:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 12:09:30 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXGUg-00078o-5S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:09:26 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXGSI-0003ap-CC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:06:58 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXFr6-0004VA-P2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:32 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EXFr5-0004Us-Kq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:31 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXFr4-0004Um-QV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:30 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EXFr4-0004N6-Ts
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:30 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EXFr3-0001N9-Uv; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 05:28:30 -0500
Original-To: Michael Mauger <mmaug@yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: <loom.20051101T205612-897@post.gmane.org> (message from Michael
	Mauger on Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:00:58 +0000 (UTC))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45293
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/45293>

    I'm finding this change a little distracting...  Is it posible to use a 
    different bitmap on the last empty line?  Maybe a `T' shape in place of the 
    lower-left corner shape.

If people prefer that, I don't object.

    I actually thought the other behavior was better and more accurate.

I can't argue with personal perceptions, but the previous behavior was
wrong and misleading.  When the buffer ends at a newline, the cursor
can go after that newline.  It is wrong to indicate that the buffer
ends before that newline--before the cursor.