From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el? Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <17243.21638.138477.436126@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17244.34246.93773.562211@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17245.17271.523511.307415@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130272257 21095 80.91.229.2 (25 Oct 2005 20:30:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ich@frank-schmitt.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 22:30:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUVOM-0006an-W8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:27:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUVOM-0000N6-Fb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EUVO2-0000KU-Vf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EUVO1-0000Jp-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUVO1-0000Jk-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EUVO0-000891-RO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EUVNy-0008PU-MD; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:27:07 -0400 Original-To: Nick Roberts In-reply-to: <17245.17271.523511.307415@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:26:31 +1300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44853 Archived-At: > To move to another file usually means moving to another frame, and > that's not the job of `until'. This command should refuse > to move to another frame. Yes, you're right. Actually, now I am not sure what I said is true. Maybe `until' just sets a temporary breakpoint and continues. If so, it would actually "work" even if you specify a line in a different function. > But there is an exception: when a function in one file is inlined in > another. In that case, shouldn't this command work? If I try it, it doesn't seem to work. Even if it, I'm not sure how we would make use of it. If it doesn't work, maybe that is a flaw in GDB. It OUGHT to be possible to proceed to a specific line in the code another function that was inlined into this function. Would you like to raise that is with bug-gdb and cc me?