From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "No further undo information" clutters *Messages* buffer Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <435C998C.3030801@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130258179 2708 80.91.229.2 (25 Oct 2005 16:36:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 18:36:16 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EURk4-0001tG-Nr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:33:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EURk3-0004im-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EURD0-0001Ur-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EURD0-0001Tt-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EURCz-0001Tb-7u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EURCz-0003fz-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EURCy-0000LF-Dl; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:59:28 -0400 Original-To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <435C998C.3030801@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:21:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44836 Archived-At: Is it inevitable that `undo-more' raises an error when there is no further undo information? That seems like the right thing to do.