From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: File modes facilities.
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:53 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EU2WP-0006Eh-5N@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICCENJCNAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130162088 20540 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2005 13:54:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 15:54:36 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EU2jP-0002fc-VT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:51:20 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EU2jP-0003tx-Cl
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:51:19 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EU2WS-000584-GQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:57 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EU2WQ-00055b-EL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU2WP-00054y-Rr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EU2WQ-0007CX-0B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:54 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EU2WP-0006Eh-5N; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:37:53 -0400
Original-To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
In-reply-to: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICCENJCNAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44712
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44712>

    I guess I still don't understand. I see this difference in completion
    behavior - do you not?

Could you describe precisely the two different behaviors?