From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: window-tree
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:55 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ESjxv-0004No-QM@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1ESSRe-0006Is-Ix@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<43573F91.3000101@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129851573 19173 80.91.229.2 (20 Oct 2005 23:39:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 01:39:31 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESk04-0000zi-61
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 01:39:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESk03-0003Dx-5I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:39:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESjxy-0001LQ-Qu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ESjxx-0001IV-5t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESjxw-0001I9-HX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESjxw-0005pY-OU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:56 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ESjxv-0004No-QM; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:36:55 -0400
Original-To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <43573F91.3000101@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on
	Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:56:17 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44452
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44452>

    Sorry, I forgot to tell. I have done that in 
    http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/DL/elisp/test/bw.el. It now checks for 
    Kim's patch and uses that if it is available (as `window-split-tree').

    The code not to be cleaned up a bit. Then I believe it should replace 
    the current balance-windows.

Will you clean it up and install it?