From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: image size limit? Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oe5v7q19.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87k6giiqh3.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87hdbht7v9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d5m3zu20.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <85ek6hitq3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129753443 3235 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2005 20:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 22:24:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKRK-0007M6-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:21:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKRK-0000Sp-Bh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKNd-0006na-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKNc-0006mi-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESKNc-0006mO-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESKNc-0000dq-4k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1ESKNb-0002kX-0O; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:43 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44347 Archived-At: I think it makes sense for some purposes to allow max image size to be specified in absolute pixels. Here is a patch to do that: That is ok. But instead of this text ! If its value is an integer, it specifies the absolute maximum width ! and height, in pixels, for images. If its value is a floating point ! number, that number is multiplied by the width and height of the ! selected frame, in pixels, to give the maximum image width and height. ! Otherwise, no limit is placed on images. it would be clearer to write this: ! If the value is an integer, it directly specifies the maximum ! image height and width, measured in pixels. If it is a floating ! point number, it specifies the maximum image height and width ! as a ratio to the frame height and width. If the value is ! non-numeric, there is no explicit limit on the size of images.