From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Shall we use etc/images more?
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:14 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ERYoQ-0008QS-O6@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <14536.1126060623@olgas.newt.com>
	<E1EDCMR-00043d-Vd@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20721.1126158478@olgas.newt.com> <873bo9vree.fsf@olgas.newt.com>
	<m3fys948za.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> <7638.1128030339@olgas.newt.com>
	<11495.1128040804@olgas.newt.com>
	<E1ELR4A-0001jP-7b@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<27612.1129358734@olgas.newt.com>
	<E1ER9hI-0006ka-4c@fencepost.gnu.org> <23150.1129485640@olgas.newt.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129570344 10436 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2005 17:32:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:32:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 19:32:20 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERYob-0000RP-Bc
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:30:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERYoa-0006ya-Q5
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERYoS-0006yA-4c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:16 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ERYoR-0006xq-Gu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYoR-0006xn-E1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERYoR-00004u-Gz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:15 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ERYoQ-0008QS-O6; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:30:14 -0400
Original-To: Bill Wohler <wohler@newt.com>
In-reply-to: <23150.1129485640@olgas.newt.com> (message from Bill Wohler on
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:00:40 -0700)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44198
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44198>

    It also just occurred to me that we could now be more descriptive name
    in the directory name as well by using low-color instead of lc.

    What do you think?

I don't care.