From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: flyspell bug
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:05 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EQHqT-0002v7-Gc@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051012103141.23D7.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
	<E1EPv57-0007xj-5f@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20051013122745.23F5.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129266816 11408 80.91.229.2 (14 Oct 2005 05:13:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:13:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 14 07:13:34 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EQHrT-0004Ch-8H
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:12:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EQHrS-0000fl-ID
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:12:06 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EQHqV-0008QI-K9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:07 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EQHqV-0008Q0-0q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQHqU-0008Pu-VA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:06 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EQHqU-0005wi-Rn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EQHqT-0002v7-Gc; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:11:05 -0400
Original-To: Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawomir.nowaczyk.847@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <20051013122745.23F5.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
	(message from Slawomir Nowaczyk on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:40:54 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44016
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44016>

    But sometimes it seems to behave strangely, like taking 10 seconds to
    go from 0% to 10%, then immediately jumping to 40%, and then
    immediately reporting "Spell Checking completed." And in such cases
    the buffer is not checked correctly.

I agree.  If you send us a test case that fails, we can debug it.