From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bug with file name completing
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:02 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ENxaY-00045J-4w@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051007.062959.123909205.wl@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128712288 20034 80.91.229.2 (7 Oct 2005 19:11:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:11:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 07 21:11:14 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ENxb7-0007le-0V
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:09:39 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ENxb6-0003qX-6U
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:36 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ENxaZ-0003hZ-M0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:03 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ENxaY-0003hA-Tu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ENxaY-0003h3-QL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ENxaY-0004A1-NT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:02 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ENxaY-00045J-4w; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:09:02 -0400
Original-To: Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <20051007.062959.123909205.wl@gnu.org> (message from Werner
	LEMBERG on Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:29:59 +0200 (CEST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43653
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43653>

This is the completion-ignored-extensions feature at work.
.pdf is ignored; .ps is not, because (the idea is) that's a language
people sometimes edit.

In fact, nearly all .ps files are generated by programs, just as .pdf
files are.  Should we add .ps to completion-ignored-extensions?