From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: flyspell bug
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:34:45 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EMSKz-00013B-Bx@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1EM7K7-0005sd-CK@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20051002220548.22F6.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
	<m37jcvpp8p.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128354042 32699 80.91.229.2 (3 Oct 2005 15:40:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:40:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: slawomir.nowaczyk.847@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 03 17:40:39 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EMSOm-0006F2-SY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:38:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EMSOm-0006PG-FD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:38:40 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EMSLI-0005KX-38
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:35:04 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EMSLE-0005I1-HD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:35:00 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EMSLE-0005GS-69
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:35:00 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EMSL0-0002iv-9j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:34:46 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EMSKz-00013B-Bx; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:34:45 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m37jcvpp8p.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43495
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43495>

    I often wondered why there are no hooks associated with switching
    buffers, windows, and frames.

These activities are too low level.  Certainly in the past it was not
safe to run Lisp code for switching buffers, and maybe not for windows
either.  Nowadays, since Lisp code can run during redisplay, maybe
it would be safe.  But I do not like the idea.  Do you really want
set-buffer to run Lisp code you don't know about?