From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com: Emacs very slow opening file] Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:31:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050929095157.GA6233@kenny.sha-bang.local> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128037200 6144 80.91.229.2 (29 Sep 2005 23:40:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 01:39:58 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EL7zb-0006WA-64 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:39:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EL7za-0003ms-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EL7xz-0003Vy-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EL7xs-0003Rf-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EL7xq-0003Gv-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:37:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EL7rk-0003lq-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EL7rk-0004Br-5r; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:31:04 -0400 Original-To: Sascha Wilde In-reply-to: <20050929095157.GA6233@kenny.sha-bang.local> (message from Sascha Wilde on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:51:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43373 Archived-At: So, I would conclude, that there is no bug at all. Emacs can't possibly know, that the "Local Variables:" block isn't meant to be interpreted in the diff file. =20 Hmm. It still feels like a bug to me, and I want to find a way to fix it. One idea is to restrict what strings can be used as the "prefix" in a local variables list, so that local variables lists in diff output are not obeyed. Meanwhile, I think it is also a bug that Font-Lock in C mode parses most of the file, even when given data that isn't really C.