From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EK2oz-0005bm-EF@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m24q89f2ye.fsf@eqiao.com> <E1EJkvl-0005re-Em@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uaci0ifmc.fsf@news.eqiao.com> <85ek7cl8b0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1127779346 21167 80.91.229.2 (27 Sep 2005 00:02:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:02:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, chenggao@gmail.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 02:02:18 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EK2vJ-0000xm-8K
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:02:17 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EK2vI-0001pH-Oi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 20:02:16 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EK2q1-00052P-VX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:56:50 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EK2pz-000513-J4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:56:48 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EK2py-0004xG-W7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:56:47 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EK2p2-0004Av-27
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:55:48 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EK2oz-0005bm-EF; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85ek7cl8b0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:14:27 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43271
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/43271>

    Well, I think then it should be left to the package maintainer to
    decide whether he wants to maintain a common XEmacs/Emacs version, or
    just maintain the version for Emacs.

The author is Bill Perry, but ISTR he is not in contact with us
any more.  When is the last time we heard from him?

If he is indeed still involved, then we can ask him what he prefers.
If not, we should put "Maintainer: FSF" in these files.