From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Potential GC-related problems in compose_chars_in_text Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:39:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k6hh2fe8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126965830 31017 80.91.229.2 (17 Sep 2005 14:03:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 17 16:03:38 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGdGi-0001Ag-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:02:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGdGh-0002Vr-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EGdGK-0002Ut-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:01:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EGdGJ-0002UN-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:01:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGdG2-00027c-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EGcuK-0001X5-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1EGcuI-0003hJ-Ga; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 09:39:06 -0400 Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <87k6hh2fe8.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:39:34 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43038 Archived-At: Actually, it often happens that things like ENABLE_CHECKING add assert statements in the macro expansion which causes the args to be used more than once. As far as I can see, ENABLE_CHECKING has no such effect anywhere. And there is only one definition of SREF.