From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] my first patch for emacs
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:59:21 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EGFoH-0004uy-Np@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1126709585.12119.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126877538 18047 80.91.229.2 (16 Sep 2005 13:32:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:32:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 15:32:15 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGGH1-0003D9-7c
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:29:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGGH0-00033M-K4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:29:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGFtZ-0002jH-9c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:04:50 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EGFtW-0002iP-FM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:04:47 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EGFtV-0002Gw-CQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:04:45 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EGFoI-00015u-T3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:59:22 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EGFoH-0004uy-Np; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:59:21 -0400
Original-To: Marcin Antczak <marcin.antczak@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <1126709585.12119.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from
	Marcin Antczak on Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:53:05 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42988
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/42988>

To help us think about your patch, could you explain what it is
supposed to do differently?  What is the case which you would
like to treat differently, and why?