From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Bindings on the mode-line
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:01:34 -0400
Message-ID: <E1EG4be-0000Rq-J4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <17191.62447.650488.109197@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<E1EFjgj-0000hq-Ej@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17192.63232.396828.455702@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126833040 1220 80.91.229.2 (16 Sep 2005 01:10:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:10:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 03:10:33 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EG4j5-0007rk-OL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:09:15 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EG4j5-0004G0-4Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:09:15 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EG4ed-00030X-O5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:04:42 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EG4eK-0002q9-U0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:04:23 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG4eJ-0002p8-LC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:04:19 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EG4bo-0001cT-HF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:01:44 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EG4be-0000Rq-J4; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:01:34 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17192.63232.396828.455702@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from
	Nick Roberts on Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:22:24 +1200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42974
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/42974>

I still don't like this.  What I don't like is that a command invoked
by clicking in the mode line reads a number in the minibuffer.
That seems like a bad interface design.