From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Avoiding moving point into minibuffer prompt area Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:02:09 -0400 Message-ID: References: <43014167.5000109@student.lu.se> <200508160413.j7G4Dt106348@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <4301AC2B.7040104@student.lu.se> <87ll3288tb.fsf@jurta.org> <4301C4C5.5020608@student.lu.se> <43026578.70207@student.lu.se> <430361EB.3050806@student.lu.se> <43050FB3.6030405@student.lu.se> <4306717A.5050806@student.lu.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1124687823 20875 80.91.229.2 (22 Aug 2005 05:17:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 07:17:00 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E74ef-0008Ad-Sc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:15:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E74iN-00012R-Cd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E74d4-0007IA-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:13:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E74cy-0007EJ-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:13:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E74cx-00077t-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E74SX-00026Q-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1E74Rl-0004uJ-OA; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:02:09 -0400 Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-reply-to: <4306717A.5050806@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 01:55:38 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42308 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:42308 >Normally, delete-backward-char at the beginning of the buffer >gives an error, "Beginning of buffer". It would seem strange >if, when just after the prompt, it did nothing at all. > > Perhaps not. Is not this another situation. The buffer could be scrolled down (for example). I don't understand; I think we are failing to communicate.