From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin,gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: is there a cygwin maintainer for gnu emacs?
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:27:11 -0400
Message-ID: <E1E3E1X-0003e9-Kh@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BAY107-F29E79AE5E6EDDEC1D619EBF8BA0@phx.gbl> 	<42F9E707.1030302@spirentcom.com> <ull39oevh.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123770736 15924 80.91.229.2 (11 Aug 2005 14:32:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:32:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jbuehler@spirentcom.com, emacs_user@hotmail.com, 	cygwin@cygwin.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: cygwin-return-111628-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com Thu Aug 11 16:32:11 2005
Return-path: <cygwin-return-111628-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com>
Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([12.107.209.250])
	by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1E3E3u-0002CR-Hz
	for goc-cygwin@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:29:38 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 18751 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2005 14:29:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-goc-cygwin=m.gmane.org@cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Original-Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Original-Received: (qmail 18719 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2005 14:29:29 -0000
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:29:29 +0000
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) 	id 1E3E1X-0003e9-Kh; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:27:11 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <ull39oevh.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 10 	Aug 2005 20:56:02 +0300)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.os.cygwin:67864 gmane.emacs.devel:41913
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41913

    When GC encounters a fatal inconsistency in the Emacs data structures,
    it is generally unsafe to say anything, since that could easily cause
    a nested fatal signal.

It would also not be very useful, since any info we could put into
such an error message could be quickly discovered by a little
investigation with a debugger.