From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: New balance-windows (Was Re: Making the width of three windows equal) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:15:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pssv3kai.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> <1123035204.009217.187300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87fytr3ea2.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> <200508061159.j76BxILQ018985@beta.mvs.co.il> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123436127 22491 80.91.229.2 (7 Aug 2005 17:35:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: knipknap@jabber.org, help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, spam@mouse-potato.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 19:35:24 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E1p2G-0003yi-Ab for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:34:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E1p5E-0000Uq-1v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E1p2M-0006On-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E1p2K-0006NK-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E1oz7-0004MV-H8; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E1ozc-0002Nq-IG; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1E1okJ-0007zE-Bc; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:15:35 -0400 Original-To: ehud@unix.mvs.co.il In-reply-to: <200508061159.j76BxILQ018985@beta.mvs.co.il> (ehud@unix.mvs.co.il) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41661 gmane.emacs.help:28517 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41661 Why do you think this is better than the current balance-windows function? (I would rather we focus attention on the steps needed to make a release.)