From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unnecessary fringe-indicators defcustom creates trouble Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:44:36 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200507290113.j6T1Drc18126@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200508010247.j712l3B02940@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200508012118.j71LI0N06793@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123006417 19399 80.91.229.2 (2 Aug 2005 18:13:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 20:13:36 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E01Ed-0001g8-6l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:11:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E01HL-0004E9-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E01Dh-0002Wp-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E013F-0008T4-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E013F-0008F4-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E012J-0007Y2-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:58:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1E00oe-0005kz-R3; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:44:36 -0400 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200508012118.j71LI0N06793@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:18:00 -0500 (CDT)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41437 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41437 I do not believe that getting rid of a cumbersome redundant variable is a major change. It is major compared with the problem you're talking about. I've told you my decision and explained it; I don't want to spend more time on the issue.