From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:54:13 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DyVJV-0006g0-3j@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b05072808342754c651@mail.gmail.com>	<fc339e4a0507281440288e7ec9@mail.gmail.com>
	<f7ccd24b050728162968f332b3@mail.gmail.com> <E1DyJ15-0005WF-00@etlken>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122645864 22201 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2005 14:04:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:04:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 16:04:21 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DyVS8-0006kX-Jg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:03:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DyVUd-0005NH-BE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:05:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DyVTX-0005FM-Jp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:35 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DyVTN-00058Y-28
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:25 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyVTM-00055i-QY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:04:24 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DyVW3-0006yt-W9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:07:12 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DyVJV-0006g0-3j; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:54:19 -0400
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <E1DyJ15-0005WF-00@etlken> (message from Kenichi Handa on Fri, 29
	Jul 2005 09:46:23 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41305
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41305

    Such a cosmetic change will cause lots of conflicts in
    emacs-unicode branch.  Could you please postpone it until
    emacs-unicode is merged?

There's no reason to do this now if it would cause any inconvenience.