From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Task done?
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:35:16 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Drqwm-0007hT-CS@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Dgjae-0000Fl-6O@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20050705090041.GA10450@fencepost>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121063831 29347 80.91.229.2 (11 Jul 2005 06:37:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:37:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 08:37:10 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DrruS-0002o7-Tm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:36:57 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Drrw1-0002vU-CG
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:38:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DrrYF-0005rx-Kw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:59 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DrrXy-0005kE-Un
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:43 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrrXv-00058R-Oa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Drr6s-0007iC-74
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:45:42 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Drqwm-0007hT-CS; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:35:16 -0400
Original-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <20050705090041.GA10450@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on
	Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:00:41 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40756
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40756

    It's not clear what the TODO entry means, so I don't know.  longlines and
    refill do different things, so it seems incorrect to think of longlines as
    replacing refill;

Why do you think that is not correct?  To me they seem to be doing the
same job, just in different ways.